tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671675431852443995.post2650616764334201134..comments2023-07-14T16:39:32.193+01:00Comments on Drawing from an uncomfortable position: Supreme Court: watching the JusticesIsobel Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17910940801350695989noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671675431852443995.post-52241952918162155212016-11-16T19:30:02.551+00:002016-11-16T19:30:02.551+00:00Yep, nine is usually the max - just have to wait a...Yep, nine is usually the max - just have to wait and see I guess.Isobel Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17910940801350695989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671675431852443995.post-12770512710335313972016-11-16T19:02:10.664+00:002016-11-16T19:02:10.664+00:00Talking of Article 50, they have said that all 11 ...Talking of Article 50, they have said that all 11 justices will sit. But I think (am not sure) that all the courtrooms are set up for a maximum of nine justices. Will there be folding tables at the ends of the row for the two most junior ones? Or would that obstruct the fire escape routes?Richard Baronhttp://www.rbphilo.com/noreply@blogger.com